After Harvard, you spent two years at the University of
Cambridge. What are the differences between American and British poets, or the
relationship between them?
I remember feeling how oddly unrelated British and American poets were in the
'70s. At the "high" end, there's more interchange — we read Seamus
Heaney; some people here read Geoffrey Hill. You read Robert Lowell, or even
John Ashbery in certain quarters. But in the middle it sometimes feels that
there’s almost no connection. I remember going to hear poets like Lee Harwood
read, sort of British “New York School” poets, in London when I was a student.
They were very much on the outer edge of experimentalism in Britain. As
students, of course, we would read David Jones and people who had historical
relevance, and Philip Larkin was still alive then, who was very great. I
remember being totally overwhelmed reading "The Whitsun Weddings" on
a train in England. But a lot of the "everyday" poets don’t really
speak to each other. It’s almost as if they are reading each other through a
glass darkly. I think that’s particularly true of the Britons reading American
poets.